- A1 - Assignee of Contract Indemnification Rights under a Design-Build Contract Stands in Shoes of Indemnitee and is Entitled to Recover Defense Costs
- A2 - Expert Survey of Small Sample of Walls Sufficient to Justify Opinion that Much Larger Area of Walls Must be Torn out and Replaced by Design-Builder for Failing to Meet Specifications for Rebar
- A3 - Design-Builder Entitled to Contractual Indemnity from Subcontractor for Damages to Turbines
- A4 - CGL Insurance Covers Damages Caused by Defective Workmanship of Subcontractor
- A5 - Liquidated Damages in Design-Build subcontract Are Enforceable Even Where Far Exceeding Actual Damages
- A6 - Contractor Permitted to Sue Architect for Implied Warranty of Specifications
- A7 - Architect Owes No Contractual or Common Law Duty to Third Party for Alleged Negligence in Construction Administration Services Performed for Its Client-Homeowner
- A1 - Architect Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Indemnification Obligation Owed to Project Owner
- A2 - Contractor Loses Malicious Prosecution Action against Homeowner that had Unsuccessfully Sued the Contractor in Construction Defect Litigation
- A3 - Contractor’s Claim against CGL Insurance Company Dismissed Because It Failed to Give Company Timely Notice of Plaintiff’s Claim Related to Defective Work
- A4 - Owner Permitted to Sue a Subcontractor in Idaho, and Economic Loss Doctrine Did Not Bar Claim
- A5 - Project Owner Not Liable for Injuries to Employee of Independent Contractor
- A1 - Homebuilder Successfully Offered Express Limited Home Warranty That Waived Implied Warranty of Good Workmanship
- A2 - Engineer That Did Work without Written Change Order Not Entitled to Be Paid for Additional Services
- A3 - Subcontractor Had Rights as Third Party Beneficiary Under Federal Government Contract
- A4 - Design Professional Had no Liability for Worker’s Injuries Because Intervening Acts of Contractor Prevented Designer’s Alleged Acts from Being the Proximate Cause
- A5 - Architect Entitled to Insurance Defense for ADA and FHA Claims Arising out of Services Performed for Condominium Developer
- A1 - Principal of Limited Liability Company can be Sued without Need to Pierce Corporate Veil
- A2 - Subcontractor Was Wrongfully Terminated Where Its Performance was Delayed by the Prime Contractor and Others
- A3 - General Contractor Can Recover Damages Caused by Sub’s Defective Work From the Sub’s CGL Policy
- A4 - Economic Loss Doctrine Bars Contractor’s Insurance Carrier from Bringing Subrogation action against Design Professional for Negligence
- A5 - Architect Not Entitled to Recover Fee for Services on Foreign Embassy Because Not Licensed in Washington, D.C.
- A1 - Federal Court in Tennessee Holds Insurer Responsible Under CGL Policy For Defending Contractor Against Negligence Claims
- A2 - Shifting Sands beneath the Economic Loss Doctrine in Washington
- A3 - Contractual Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Breach of Contract Claim against Contractor by a Third Party
- A4 - Defective Work of Subcontractor Covered under Prime Contractor CGL Policy
Connect