Contractor Entitled to Equitable Adjustment on Navy Contract for Constructive Change that Resulted from Navy’s Interpretation of Ambiguous Specification

See article in Construction Risk Newsletter:
ConstructionRisk.com Report Vol. #12, Issue #4

See article in the following topic indices:
,,,, 

Email this page to a friend:

Where Navy’s plans and specifications for roofing work were less than clear, and the contractor reasonably interpreted the contract as calling for waterproof paint rather than multiple-ply flashing material, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found the contractor’s interpretation was reasonable and it was therefore entitled to recover its costs for installing the [...]

Email this page to a friend: