by Kent Holland | Feb 7, 2011 | differing site conditions, Newsletter Article
A state court in California declined to enforce a “no-damage-for-delay” clause that would have deprived a construction contractor of equitable adjustment for time delays and expenses caused by the project owner, City of Los Angeles. The city had superior...
by Kent Holland | Feb 7, 2011 | indemnification clause, Newsletter Article
Pursuant to the indemnity clause of its lease agreement with a landowner (Washington Street Investments (WSI), the Goettl Air Conditioning Company (Goettl) agreed to indemnify WSI for all damages caused in whole or in part by Goettl’s negligence. When one of...
by Kent Holland | Feb 7, 2011 | Newsletter Article
A subcontractor worked on a project for five months without being paid and then sued the A/E for negligence, claiming that the A/E owed it a duty, as a third party beneficiary, to assure that the contractor maintained a payment bond or paid the subcontractor before...
by Kent Holland | Feb 7, 2011 | Newsletter Article
The owners of a home under construction were sued by an architect whose copyrighted plans were used without permission in the design and construction of their new house. This architect (Mr. Page) sued the owners (Mr. and Ms. Gunthrop) for copyright infringement. A...
by Kent Holland | Feb 7, 2011 | Newsletter Article
A court dismissed a project owner’s suit against the manufacturer of flooring materials that were used in the building because there was no privity of contract between the owner and he manufacturer. The manufacturer was a subcontractor to the flooring contractor...
by Kent Holland | Feb 7, 2011 | indemnification clause, Newsletter Article
According to a Louisiana appellate court, an indemnification clause can not be enforced to require a party to indemnify for the indemnitee’s own negligence unless the clause specifically states that to be the intent of the parties in no uncertain terms. An...
Connect