- A1 - Design Professional Duty to Mitigate Against Storm and Flood damage
- A2 - An Engineering Intern Could not be Liable for Professional Negligence
- A3 - Suit Limited to Breach of Contract/Warranty – Negligence Count was Duplicative and Dismissed
- A4 - Contractor May Sue Construction Manager for Losses Due to Alleged Poor Project Oversight and Interference with Contractor’s Work
- A5 - Contractor Entitled to Summary Judgment against Project Owner’s Negligence Claim where Contractor had no Design Responsibility for Disc Filter Equipment Provided by its Vendor pursuant to the Project Specifications
- A6 - Contractor can’t be Sued for Damages Contribution by Engineer Where Contractor has no Possible Tort Liability to Injured Parties
- A1 - Webinar (on demand): Quality Assurance/Quality Control for Designers & Design-Builders
- A2 - Design Professional Duty to Mitigate Against Storm and Flood damage
- A3 - Suggested Wording to Use When Revising and Redlining Design Professional Contracts for Risk Allocation and Insurability of Risks
- A1 - Indemnification Duty not Incorporated by Reference to Prime Contract
- A2 - Contractor may Sue Design Firms for Defective Plans & Specs on which They Relied
- A3 - Parol Evidence not Permitted to Alter Integrated Contract - Quantum Meruit Claim Fails
- A4 - Indemnification Clause Unenforceable Where it did not Clearly Require Indemnification for the Indemnitee’s Own Negligence
- A1 - Third Party Beneficiary Claim against Subcontractor
- A2 - Lien Waiver and Release Forfeited Prime’s Right to Assert Subcontractor Pass-Through Claim
- A3 - Single Employer Site Safety Liability: GC Found Responsible for Acts of its Subcontractor
- A1 - Why a Project Owner Isn’t Made an Additional Insured Under a Design Professional Policy
- A2 - Contract Language Made Code Compliance a separate Duty from the Standard of Care Duty
- A3 - Subcontractor Indemnification to Prime for Arbitration Award to Homeowner is Barred because Award did not explain basis for decision and would violate anti-indemnity statute if Prime was negligent
- A4 - Statute of Limitations Began to Run on Date Homeowner Saw Rust on Roof and not from Date Leaking Began
- A5 - Texas Certificate of Merit Requirement Does not apply to Third-Party Contribution Claims
- A1 - Construction Manager Owes Independent Duty of Care to Contractor – Economic Loss Affords no Protection
- A2 - Implied Contract Allows Subcontractor to make claim directly against project Owner for Unjust Enrichment and Get Around Pay-if-Paid Clause
- A3 - Labor Shortage is Slowing Down Construction
- A4 - Builders Risk Policy Faulty Workmanship Exclusion applied to Wall Collapse
- A1 - Subcontractor Failure to do Soil-Compaction Testing was Covered by General Contractor’s CGL Policy as an Occurrence that Caused Damages to Building
- A2 - Arbitration Provision of Prime Contract Incorporated by Reference into Subcontract, Requiring Subcontractor to Arbitrate its Claims
- A3 - Contractor Cannot Sue Project Engineer as Owner's Agent on Implied-in-Fact Contract. Signing Check that contained the words “Final Payment” Constituted Accord and Satisfaction
- A4 - Contractor’s CGL Policy Professional Liability Exclusion Precludes Coverage for Damages from Subcontracted Land Surveyor’s Error
- A5 - Spearin Doctrine Applies to Design-Build Contracts allowing Trade Subcontractor to Rely on Designs Provided by Engineer/Subcontractor
- A1 - Contractual Agreement can shorten statutory Time Limit for Bringing Suit
- A2 - $50,000 Limitation of Liability Clause Enforced Although Eight Percent of Designer’s Fee
- A3 - Suit Dismissed with Prejudice because Certificate of Merit not filed with Complaint
- A4 - $2 million Slip and Fall Verdict for Scaffolding Accident Thrown Out because Laborer Proved Elements of Premises Liability but Judge’s Jury Instruction Mistakenly Only Addressed General Negligence. A costly Trial Error
- A5 - 10 tips for making the home safer for elderly relatives
- A1 - Professional Liability Exclusion in CGL Policy Barred Coverage for $25 Million Damages Claim from Ruptured Pipe Line
- A2 - Building Code Requirements Imposed Non-Delegable Duty on General Contractor for Safety Guardrails
- A3 - Construction Manager not Responsible for Injuries to a Contractor’s Employee where it had no Ability to Control the Contractor’s Activity
- A4 - CM/General Contractor, as a Statutory Employer, is Entitled to Workers’ Compensation Act Immunity from Suit by Subcontractor’s Injured Employee
- A1 - Economic Loss Doctrine did not bar a Contractor’s Negligent Misrepresentation Claim against Architect Seeking Indemnity against Subcontractor Delay Claim
- A2 - Implied Warranty of Habitability does not Apply to Design Professionals and Material Suppliers who did not Perform Construction Work on Condominium
- A3 - Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Penalties against Project Owner can be Recovered from Engineer and Contractor through Indemnification and Contribution Claims
- A4 - Indemnification Clause that Included Voidable Provision was Enforced to Extent Legally Permissible Instead of Throwing out Entire Clause
Connect