- A1 - A Demand Letter to an Insured Architect and Others was not Deemed to be “Claim” that had to be Reported to the Professional Insurance Carrier
- A2 - Insurance Carrier could not assert the Contractual Liability Exclusion to Deny Coverage for Breach of Contract Claim that arose out of Negligence
- A3 - Parties Waived their Contractual Rights to Arbitrate
- A1 - Indemnification - Negotiating a Reasonable Clause
- A2 - Individual Doing Business as a corporate name Held Individually Liable
- A3 - Liquidated Damages Are Restricted When Contractor Completed Major Two Phases of Three- Phase Government Project
- A4 - Default Termination was Improper and was Converted to Termination for Convenience
- A1 - Shifting Liability from Contractor to Owner: Texas Finally Joins the Rest of the Nation on Defective Plans & Specs
- A2 - Indemnification: Contractor’s Employee not an “Agent” entitled to Indemnification
- A3 - Summary Judgment where Insufficient Expert Testimony to Prove Negligence
- A1 - Be Careful about Responsibility for Defective Cost Estimates in Current Environment of Price Spikes and Supply Shortages
- A2 - Economic Loss Doctrine Inapplicable to Condo HOA suit
- A3 - No Insurance under CGL Policy for Contractual Dispute
- A1 - Subcontractor Entitled to Recover Costs of Removing Asphalt Pavement instead of Limited Amount of Concrete Pavement as Specified
- A2 - Contractor Cannot make Performance Bond Claim when it Failed to Terminate its Subcontractor
- A3 - Contractor had no Professional Liability Coverage under CGL Policy
- A1 - Indemnification Unenforceable against Design Firm by Construction Contractor
- A2 - Individual was not an “Agent” entitled to Indemnification
- A3 - Economic Loss Doctrine Bars Suit by Developer against a Subcontractor
- A1 - Pay-if-paid Provisions Not Per Se Unenforceable in Nevada
- A2 - Contractor Entitled to Recover Delay Damages including Overhead Costs
- A3 - Insurance Carrier Was Correctly Dismissed from Litigation Against Engineer
- A1 - Brand Name or Equal Specification Makes Contractor Responsible for Design Changes Necessary for use of the Or Equal
- A2 - Road Construction Contractor Owed Duty of Care to Motorist
- A1 - Government Contractor Entitled to Time Extension (but not Costs) Caused by Pandemic Delay to Project
- A2 - Upcoming Webinar Provides Insights from Leading Construction General Counsel
- A3 - Design Professional Contracts: 1 Minute Construction Risk Management Video Series
- A4 - General Contractor Allowed to Bring Third Party Claim against Architect for Defective Specifications
- A1 - Dispute under Design-Build Teaming Agreement and Subcontract may be Subject to Arbitration even if Statute of Limitations has Lapsed
- A2 - Economic Loss Doctrine Applied to Dismiss Homeowner Suit against Geotechnical Firm that Issued Soils Report to Developer
- A3 - Fraud Claims against Engineer Dismissed for Lack of Specificity
Connect