by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | Newsletter Article, standard of care
A plaintiff’s expert witness was challenged by the defendant on the basis that the expert’s testimony failed to adequately demonstrate that there was a consensus within the architectural community for the standard of care that he asserted applied in the case. The...
by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | Newsletter Article
Subcontractor is not permitted under the Contracts Disputes Act (CDA) to bring an action against the federal government where the prime contractor failed to pay the subcontractor for its work. This is true even though the federal department (U.S. Navy) committed to...
by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | Newsletter Article
The liquidated damages (LD) provision in a federally funded contract to re-stripe an interstate highway was held to be enforceable against the contractor that failed to complete a project on time. When the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT or MDOT) assessed...
by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | Newsletter Article
A homeowner in California that contracted with a construction company to build a house filed suit for breach of contract and negligence, and violations of the state licensure requirements – seeking to recover sums it had paid to the contractor. The construction...
by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | Newsletter Article
An employee of a contractor died due a trench collapse during installation of a sewer line. His wife filed a wrongful death action against the project engineer, alleging that the firm overseeing the project owed a duty to the worker to perform its professional...
by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | Newsletter Article, standard of care
A Court of Appeals in Texas ruled that expert testimony is required to establish the standard of care of a construction management firm since a lay person would not have sufficient knowledge of the duties of a construction management firm. Judgment was entered for the...
Connect