by Kent Holland | Aug 11, 2014 | Newsletter Article
By J. Kent Holland, Esq ConstructionRisk Counsel, PLLC The Utah Supreme Court rejected the multi-employer worksite doctrine as incompatible with the governing Utah statute, holding, “The responsibility for ensuring occupational safety under the governing statute is...
by Kent Holland | Jul 8, 2014 | Newsletter Article
Where an insurance broker marketed and sold a self-insured workers compensation program for contractors (the Contractors Access Program of California (CAP)) that subsequently became financially insolvent and failed, leaving the contractors exposed to considerable...
by Kent Holland | Jul 8, 2014 | differing site conditions, Newsletter Article
A contractor on a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers project filed a complaint with the U.S. Claims Court, claiming it was entitled to equitable adjustment to its contract for additional costs and time due to encountering differing site conditions while dredging the Miami...
by Kent Holland | Jul 8, 2014 | Newsletter Article
Dion N. Cominos, Esq. Gordon & Rees LLP The Supreme Court of California has now published its decision in Beacon v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (211 Cal.App.4th 1301 (2014)). In short, the Court concluded that prime architects designing residential...
by Kent Holland | Jul 8, 2014 | Newsletter Article, standard of care
Architect is subject to potential liability for failure of design to comply with fire code requirements regardless of whether the generally accepted standard of care was satisfied. This is due to breach of contract language requiring absolute code compliance. The...
by Kent Holland | Jun 16, 2014 | Newsletter Article
By R. Burns Logan, Esq. A few weeks ago I wrote an article on construction pre-construction meetings. See article here. That article was intended to benefit contractors who are beginning work on a new project. However, pre-construction meetings are also extremely...
Connect