by Kent Holland | Feb 17, 2014 | Newsletter Article
Many states require that when a complaint is filed against a design professional, an affidavit of an expert must be filed simultaneously (or within a short period thereafter) stating that in the opinion of the expert the defendant design professional failed to meet...
by Kent Holland | Feb 17, 2014 | differing site conditions, Newsletter Article
Holds Government Cannot Bar Differing Site Conditions Claims with Broad Disclaimer Language, AND Government is Bound by a Broad Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing In a major victory, not only for the contractor, but also for historic federal contract principles, the...
by Kent Holland | Jan 31, 2014 | differing site conditions, Newsletter Article
On a contract for a renovation and asbestos removal in a state office building, the contractor claimed there was a differing site condition making asbestos removal more difficult than anticipated. The Supreme Court of Alaska held that the contractor could have...
by Kent Holland | Jan 30, 2014 | Newsletter Article
A question often arises whether there is insurance coverage under a commercial general liability (CGL) policy for damage the insured contractor’s own work. Many states require that there is no insurable “occurrence” under a CGL policy unless there has been damage to...
by Kent Holland | Jan 30, 2014 | Newsletter Article
The New Jersey Schools Development Authority rejected, as nonresponsive, a bidder’s technical proposal on a design-build contract for a new school because a key team member of the bidder (the Project Architect) was involved in the previous development of the design...
by Kent Holland | Jan 30, 2014 | Newsletter Article
By James Rhodes & Kent Holland A federal district court in Pennsylvania ruled that the insurer of a hotel’s second owner could advance a negligence action against the general contractor for alleged code violations that may have contributed to a fire. Ultimately,...
Connect