- A1 - Architect’s Copyright Infringement Action against Another Architect was Properly Dismissed by Trial Court on a Motion to Dismiss
- A2 - Contractor Suit against Project Owner’s Lender for Failing to Pay for Work Performed on Project is Dismissed
- A3 - Contractor Entitled to Recover Additional Compensation Due to Project Owner’s Failure to Disclose Material Information During Bidding Process – even Where Nondisclosure was not Done with Affirmative Intent to Conceal the Information
- A1 - Expert Testimony Found Insufficient to Establish Standard of Care against Engineering Firm
- A2 - Where Mold Damage was Expressly Excluded from Coverage, the Fact it Resulted from a Covered Concurrent Cause Did not Bring it Back Within Coverage
- A3 - Developer’s Assignee Can Bring Suit against Engineer for Redesign Costs but Economic Loss Rule Prevents Original Developer (Assignor) from Bringing Negligence Action against Engineer
- A4 - Agreeing to Pay Reasonable Attorneys Fees as Part of Indemnification May Create Uninsurable Loss
- A5 - The Duty to Defend as part of Indemnity Agreement is Alive and Well in California: Don’t be fooled by Favorable Commentary on California SB 972
- A1 - Economic Loss Doctrine Bars Contractor Suit against Engineer
- A2 - Expert Testimony is Required to Prove Construction Management Failed to Meet the Standard of Care
- A3 - Professional Services Exclusion of Engineer’s CGL Policy Properly Applied to Bar Coverage for Wrongful Death Action Resulting from Trench Collapse
- A4 - Unlicensed Contractor forced to Refund all Payments back to the Homeowners
- A1 - Liquidated Damages Enforced Against Road Re-Striping Contractor on Federal Highway Project
- A2 - Subcontractor Barred from Appealing Federal Government Decision on a Prime Contract Dispute Even though it was 3rd Party Beneficiary
- A3 - Expert Witness Adequately Testified to Consensus Opinion on Applicable Standard of Care
- A4 - Limitation of Liability Clause in Engineer’s Contract Enforced in Georgia
- A5 - Contractor Entitled to Equitable Adjustment on Navy Contract for Constructive Change that Resulted from Navy’s Interpretation of Ambiguous Specification
- A6 - Bodily Injuries and Property Damage from Garage Collapse are Excluded from Coverage under Design Professional’s CGL Policy
- A1 - Construction Manager is Immune from a Contractor’s Employee Personal Injury Suit pursuant to the Workers Compensation Statute
- A2 - Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Economic Loss Doctrine
- A3 - Design Professionals Should not Agree to Defend Clients
- A4 - $26.9 Million in Liquidated Damages Not a Windfall to Power Plant Owner
Connect