Additional Insured Prime Contractor Entitled to be Defended under Subcontractor CGL Policy Where Plaintiff Merely Alleged “Damage to Other Property”

by Kent Holland | Dec 16, 2022 | Newsletter Article

A Commercial General Liability (CGL)Insurance carrier had a duty to defend a property developer who was an additional insured under a subcontractor’s CGL policy in a lawsuit by a homeowner association (HOA). While a lower court granted the carrier summary judgment...

Where Prime Failed to Require Indemnity from Its Sub and Failed to be Named as Additional Insured – its CGL Carrier Had No Coverage Responsibility

by Kent Holland | May 31, 2022 | Newsletter Article

General contractor and its CGL carrier were sued by a subcontractor’s employee for injuries sustained when hit by truck driven by another subcontractor while working on site. The CGL moved for summary judgment on the basis that an exclusion in the policy barred...

There Must be an Alleged Negligent Act of the Named Insured to Trigger Coverage for an Additional Insured under a CGL policy

by Kent Holland | Jan 28, 2020 | Newsletter Article

Does an Additional Insured under a contractor’s commercial general liability (CGL) policy have coverage for claims against the additional insured that aren’t based on allegations of negligent acts or omissions of the named insured contractor? In this decision the...

Insured Contract Exception to Contractual-Liability Exclusion

by Kent Holland | Feb 14, 2019 | Newsletter Article

A project owner and its subcontractors were entitled to be defended and indemnified under its contractor’s commercial general liability (CGL) policy. The “contractual liability” exclusion of the policy was not applicable because indemnity was afforded under an...

Why a Project Owner Isn’t Made an Additional Insured Under a Design Professional Policy

by Kent Holland | May 13, 2018 | Newsletter Article

Design professionals do not name project owners or contractors as additional insureds under their professional liability policies. This paper from the library of articles and papers hosted on the ConstructionRisk.com website explains why. Read it here. About the...

« Older Entries

Additional Insured Prime Contractor Entitled to be Defended under Subcontractor CGL Policy Where Plaintiff Merely Alleged “Damage to Other Property”

Where Prime Failed to Require Indemnity from Its Sub and Failed to be Named as Additional Insured – its CGL Carrier Had No Coverage Responsibility

There Must be an Alleged Negligent Act of the Named Insured to Trigger Coverage for an Additional Insured under a CGL policy

Insured Contract Exception to Contractual-Liability Exclusion

Why a Project Owner Isn’t Made an Additional Insured Under a Design Professional Policy

Search

Get the Newsletter

Contract Guide for Design Professionals

Recent Newsletters

All Newsletters

Risk Management Workshops

Life Skills Workshop Slides

Contract Clauses – Papers and Articles

IRMI Expert Commentary

Construction Risk Management

Additional Insured Prime Contractor Entitled to be Defended under Subcontractor CGL Policy Where Plaintiff Merely Alleged “Damage to Other Property”

Where Prime Failed to Require Indemnity from Its Sub and Failed to be Named as Additional Insured – its CGL Carrier Had No Coverage Responsibility

There Must be an Alleged Negligent Act of the Named Insured to Trigger Coverage for an Additional Insured under a CGL policy

Insured Contract Exception to Contractual-Liability Exclusion

Why a Project Owner Isn’t Made an Additional Insured Under a Design Professional Policy

Search

Get the Newsletter

Connect

Contract Guide for Design Professionals

Recent Newsletters

All Newsletters

Risk Management Workshops

Life Skills Workshop Slides

Contract Clauses – Papers and Articles

IRMI Expert Commentary

Construction Risk Management