by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | Newsletter Article
The economic loss doctrine was enforced by the Supreme Court of Wyoming to bar a general contractor’s (GC) complaint against a project engineer with whom it lacked privity of contract. The GC had a contract was with a town to construct water and wastewater lines. The...
by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | duty to defend, Newsletter Article
With the signing into law of California Senate Bill SB 972, California amended Section 2782.8 of its Civil Code, thereby limiting the enforcement of indemnification clauses upon design professionals working for public agencies. Much positive hype and commentary has...
by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | indemnification clause, Newsletter Article
A question that is asked with increasing frequency is whether attorneys fees incurred pursuant to an indemnity clause are insurable where they are not incurred due to a duty to defend (i.e., paid on behalf of the indemnitee) but are instead paid after the litigation...
by Kent Holland | Dec 31, 2010 | Newsletter Article, standard of care
Where a contractor filed suit alleging that an engineering firm was negligent in designing, engineering and surveying land where a group of homes were planned to be built, the trial court granted summary judgment for the engineer because expert testimony offered by...
by Kent Holland | Dec 15, 2010 | duty to defend, Newsletter Article
There is no common law duty of a consultant to defend its client against third party actions. That duty can only arise as a result of a contractually liability created through the indemnification clause of the contract. Since this is a contractual liability, it is...
Connect