- A1 - Differing Site Condition Claim Barred by Contract Disclaimers
- A2 - Economic Loss Doctrine Did Not Bar Contractor Claim against Architect for Defective Specifications
- A3 - Contractor Permitted to Pursue Tort Claim against Engineer for Allegedly Defective Specs and Failure to Approve Payment Requests
- A4 - No-Damage-For-Delay Clause Enforced Even If Delay Caused by Owner’s Breach of Contract and Arbitrary Actions
- A1 - Implied Warranty of Habitability Extended Beyond Initial Home Purchaser to Second Purchasers
- A2 - Common Law Indemnity Not Owed by Architect to Developer Where Developer’s Own Alleged Negligence was Subject of Suit by Owner
- A3 - Indemnification Clause in Prime Contract is not Incorporated by Reference into Subcontract Under New York Law in Absence of Express Agreement to Do So
- A4 - Spoliation of Evidence: Contractor Had no Duty to Preserve Concrete I-Beam that Fell and Caused Injuries
- A1 - The “Completed and Accepted Doctrine” Bars Third Party Suit against Architect that Failed to Observe and Report an Obvious, Patent Construction Defect to Owner/Client
- A2 - Certificate of Merit Requirement was Waived by Engineer’s Failure to Timely Push for Dismissal
- A3 - Condominium Association Barred by Economic Loss Doctrine from Suing Consultant for Repair Costs, and Lacks Third Party Beneficiary Rights to Sue the Consultant for Breach of Warranty
- A4 - Engineer Owed Independent Duty to a Construction Contractor to Provide Design Specifications That Do Not Cause Delays and Disruptions
- A5 - Arbitration Results Between Owner and Contractor Have no Collateral Estoppel Affect in Subsequent Litigation Against Architect (Lost Profits not Recoverable in any Event)
- A6 - Subcontractor’s Waiver of Claims Against Payment Bond is Void and Unenforceable
- A7 - Subcontractor’s Waiver of Consequential Damages is Enforced where the Waiver Clause was Incorporated by Reference from the Prime Contract
- A1 - Architect Liable to an Airport Maintenance Person who was Electrocuted While Working on an Electric Switchgear Box that had No Warning Labels
- A2 - Damages Not Recoverable Where Homeowner Failed to Prove the Reasonableness of Remedial Damages Incurred or the Difference-In-Value Damages
- A3 - Project Owner Permitted to Pursue Negligence Claim Based on Breach of Contract
- A4 - The Unrelenting Tide of the Duty to Defend
- A5 - Attorneys Fees Recovered to Enforce Indemnity Agreement
- A1 - Federal Contracts: Attorneys Fees Incurred for REA Preparation and Negotiation are Allowable Says U.S. Court of Appeals in Tip Top Construction
Connect