- A1 - Shifting Liability from Contractor to Owner: Texas Finally Joins the Rest of the Nation on Defective Plans & Specs
- A2 - Indemnification: Contractor’s Employee not an “Agent” entitled to Indemnification
- A3 - Summary Judgment where Insufficient Expert Testimony to Prove Negligence
- A1 - Be Careful about Responsibility for Defective Cost Estimates in Current Environment of Price Spikes and Supply Shortages
- A2 - Economic Loss Doctrine Inapplicable to Condo HOA suit
- A3 - No Insurance under CGL Policy for Contractual Dispute
- A1 - Subcontractor Entitled to Recover Costs of Removing Asphalt Pavement instead of Limited Amount of Concrete Pavement as Specified
- A2 - Contractor Cannot make Performance Bond Claim when it Failed to Terminate its Subcontractor
- A3 - Contractor had no Professional Liability Coverage under CGL Policy
- A1 - Indemnification Unenforceable against Design Firm by Construction Contractor
- A2 - Individual was not an “Agent” entitled to Indemnification
- A3 - Economic Loss Doctrine Bars Suit by Developer against a Subcontractor
- A1 - Pay-if-paid Provisions Not Per Se Unenforceable in Nevada
- A2 - Contractor Entitled to Recover Delay Damages including Overhead Costs
- A3 - Insurance Carrier Was Correctly Dismissed from Litigation Against Engineer
Connect